This paper scrutinizes the thorny interplay between IP territorial exclusivity and competition law. First, we will look at the approach taken by the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) to the principle of exhaustion, which limits IP holders’ control over the distribution of protected works beyond national borders. Thereafter, we will investigate how the CJEU has wielded Art. 101 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU) against distribution and licensing agreements that confer absolute territorial protection (ATP), concentrating on the divergences and convergences between IP and non-IP cases. Then, we will delve into the CJEU’s approach to restrictions of passive sales that result in ATP within the broader context of EU digital policy against unjustified geo-blocking, thus discussing the conflict between geo-blocking and the free movement of digital goods and services in light of the latest judgments on the matter. Finally, this paper will advance an alternative remedial approach to deal with ATP caused by the misuse of IPRs with a view to tackling “abusive” territorial restrictions and removing uncertainty in the case law regarding competition law.

Cracking the Walls of IPRs: When Territorial Restrictions Become “Abusive” under IP Law

Camilla Signoretta
2024-01-01

Abstract

This paper scrutinizes the thorny interplay between IP territorial exclusivity and competition law. First, we will look at the approach taken by the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) to the principle of exhaustion, which limits IP holders’ control over the distribution of protected works beyond national borders. Thereafter, we will investigate how the CJEU has wielded Art. 101 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU) against distribution and licensing agreements that confer absolute territorial protection (ATP), concentrating on the divergences and convergences between IP and non-IP cases. Then, we will delve into the CJEU’s approach to restrictions of passive sales that result in ATP within the broader context of EU digital policy against unjustified geo-blocking, thus discussing the conflict between geo-blocking and the free movement of digital goods and services in light of the latest judgments on the matter. Finally, this paper will advance an alternative remedial approach to deal with ATP caused by the misuse of IPRs with a view to tackling “abusive” territorial restrictions and removing uncertainty in the case law regarding competition law.
2024
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
s40319-024-01546-5.pdf

non disponibili

Tipologia: Documento in Pre-print/Submitted manuscript
Licenza: Copyright dell'editore
Dimensione 504.75 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
504.75 kB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11382/574072
 Attenzione

Attenzione! I dati visualizzati non sono stati sottoposti a validazione da parte dell'ateneo

Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus ND
social impact