This paper scrutinizes the thorny interplay between IP territorial exclusivity and competition law. First, we will look at the approach taken by the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) to the principle of exhaustion, which limits IP holders’ control over the distribution of protected works beyond national borders. Thereafter, we will investigate how the CJEU has wielded Art. 101 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU) against distribution and licensing agreements that confer absolute territorial protection (ATP), concentrating on the divergences and convergences between IP and non-IP cases. Then, we will delve into the CJEU’s approach to restrictions of passive sales that result in ATP within the broader context of EU digital policy against unjustified geo-blocking, thus discussing the conflict between geo-blocking and the free movement of digital goods and services in light of the latest judgments on the matter. Finally, this paper will advance an alternative remedial approach to deal with ATP caused by the misuse of IPRs with a view to tackling “abusive” territorial restrictions and removing uncertainty in the case law regarding competition law.
Cracking the Walls of IPRs: When Territorial Restrictions Become “Abusive” under IP Law
Camilla Signoretta
2024-01-01
Abstract
This paper scrutinizes the thorny interplay between IP territorial exclusivity and competition law. First, we will look at the approach taken by the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) to the principle of exhaustion, which limits IP holders’ control over the distribution of protected works beyond national borders. Thereafter, we will investigate how the CJEU has wielded Art. 101 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU) against distribution and licensing agreements that confer absolute territorial protection (ATP), concentrating on the divergences and convergences between IP and non-IP cases. Then, we will delve into the CJEU’s approach to restrictions of passive sales that result in ATP within the broader context of EU digital policy against unjustified geo-blocking, thus discussing the conflict between geo-blocking and the free movement of digital goods and services in light of the latest judgments on the matter. Finally, this paper will advance an alternative remedial approach to deal with ATP caused by the misuse of IPRs with a view to tackling “abusive” territorial restrictions and removing uncertainty in the case law regarding competition law.File | Dimensione | Formato | |
---|---|---|---|
s40319-024-01546-5.pdf
non disponibili
Tipologia:
Documento in Pre-print/Submitted manuscript
Licenza:
Copyright dell'editore
Dimensione
504.75 kB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
504.75 kB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri Richiedi una copia |
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.